Friday, June 26, 2015

The Ephraimite Parthians and R1a y-dna Slavs

Today I came across an article about the Parthians being descendants of the Israelite Tribe of Ephraim by Steve Collins. This confirms my own studies using dna evidence and history to discover the descendants of the Tribes of Israel. In others articles, I have written that the secret capital city of the Parthian Empire was Parthia for which the Empire took its name. The Parthians were descended from the Royal House of the Perso-Median Empire from the Erani (Aryan) clan of Ephraim of R1a y-dna. The Parthian language was a variant of Aramaic spoken by the Northern Kingdom of Israel.

The R1a descendants of Ephraim and some of Eastern Manasseh (R1a Z93 y-dna) with the fall of the Assyrian Empire made their way into the far south to the Third India (Australia). The Warrior horsemen of Manesseh had gone with the last Israelite King of Samaria with some of the Tribes of Western Gad (O M122 y-dna) and Asher (O2 ydna) into the Western Region of China while the bulk of Eastern Manasseh (R1a Z93 y-dna) went with Reuben (R1b U152 y-dna) and Eastern Gad (O M119 y-dna)  into the southern continent across the straits of Sabbaton (Sabah) into Northern and Central Australia on the edge of the shallow Inland Sea (Yam Rhodud). 

In fact Manasseh settled in the lands that border south east Asia and Australia known as Mani, Mancy or Manxi. The Ephraimites established their secret capital city of Parthia (Barthia/ Barburi/ Beredi) at Ophir at the ancient mouth of the ancient Eridanus or Cygnus (Swan) River at the Great Canyon (Perth or Swan Canyon) which is now under the Indian Ocean west of modern day Perth in Western Australia. From here they established a huge Parthian Empire stretching back into Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran to the north as well as the now sunken lands of the southern Indian Ocean and were to challenge the might of the Roman Empire. Ophir before 600 BC had been a city of the Israelite-Egyptian-Phoenician colony in ancient Western Australia. The Parthian Empire was established by an Ophiri or Parthian Prince Arsaces (Ashkan) around 250 BC. 

Eventually the bulk of the Ephraimite Parthians moved to Afghanistan/ Western Pakistan (Paradan, Parata or Indo-Parthian Kingdom) after their defeat by the Romans in 117 AD and then into northern Europe as the Wends or Vanir (Vononi/ Voni) around the 4th century AD and were the forefathers of the later Slavic peoples belonging to R1a y-dna. The name Voni came from the Royal House of Vonones. Bagareva or Barburraja the founder of the Parata (Paradan) Kingdom was a grandson of King Vonones II of Parthia.They were known as the Slovene or Slo-voni (people of Voni or Vonones) from which the name Slav is derived.

Today the Ephraimite Great Nation and Commonwealth or Company of nations are Russia and the other Slavic nations and peoples belonging to R1a Z283 y-dna. The British and Irish peoples are not Ephraim as once proposed by British Israelite writers but they are mainly the Royal Isles of the Davidic House of Nathan (R1b L21) who once lived south of Parthia (later called Berabia by the Romans) in Western Australia in the land of Kedar (south -west Western Australia and the Naturaliste Plateau) with its great sea port of Yafa or Joppa (meaning beautiful in Hebrew). By the time of the Parthian Empire the Gaelic population of Kedar (R1b L21) had mostly moved out of Kedar which then was under Parthian rule. 

Isaiah 11:13 speaks of the traditional envy of Ephraim (the Slavic peoples) with the Jews which will one day in the future be healed and then Ephraim (Russia) and Judah (the Jews) will ally against their enemies in the Middle East. However before this Russia and the Slavic nations will need to be purified of the militaristic anti-Semitic Assyrian influences and embrace the agenda of the coming Great Catholic Monarch who will most likely be a Davidic descendant of the Czars of Russia as well as the French, Spanish, Danish, Greek, German and British Kings. 

Note: The old Irish prophecies speak of this Monarch as Ruadh (Red haired) and a son of the King of Saxon. The King of Saxon is referring to a future English King. These prophecies of a future Great Monarch or Emperor coming from Britain to rule Europe and the World were associated with the names of Charles and Henry were popular in 16th and 17th century Scotland, France, Spain and England which led to their use by the Stuart Royal Family. This Monarch would not be French but descended from the French Kings such as Charlemagne and St Louis IX as well as from an old Germanic family (the Oldenburgs). James I named his eldest son Henry (future Prince of Wales) and his second son Charles (the future Charles I). Charles I also named two sons Charles (the future Charles II) and Henry. James III the Stuart King in Exile also named two sons Charles (of Bonnie Prince Charlie fame) and Henry (the future Cardinal York). Many held great hopes in the 17th century for Bonnie Prince Charlie or his brother Prince Henry Duke of York who were British Princes and also descended from the French Kings through their mother Queen Henrietta Maria a former French Princess and their grandmother Queen Anne a former Danish Princess descended from the House of Oldenburg. However this was not the prophesied time. This Monarch would also be associated with Ephraim (Russia and the Slavic nations) and with Greece as a new Constantine the Great. Like Constantine the Great he would be born in Britain.

see Hebrew y-dna: A New Understanding

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Rumpelstiltskin and Louis XVII

 Prince William of Hesse-Kassel-Rumpenheim

Most of us are familiar with the childhood fairytale of Rumpelstiltskin about the beautiful miller's daughter with blonde hair whose father boasted that she was so talented that she could turn straw into gold. The King hears of this and threatens to cut off her head if she doesn't do so. Rumpelstiltskin then promises to help if she will give him her first born son. The Grimms Brothers collected four versions of this story in the German principality of Hesse which they published in 1812. However was this story hiding the secret identity of the lost King Louis XVII who was rumoured to have escaped from the prison around 1794?
Prince Frederick of Hesse-Kassel-Rumpenheim the original Rumpelstiltskin

Did the royal House of Oldenburg and their close relatives in the House of Hesse and the British Royal family organise the rescue of the real Louis XVII? Was Baron Gerning a close associate with the House of Hesse responsible for the rescue and replacing Louis with another boy? We know that Baron Gerning was in France in 1792 and witnessed the execution of King Louis XVI. Did the switch happen then or latter in 1794? 
King Louis XVII

Rumpelstiltskin refers cryptically to the House of Hesse-Kassel -Rumpenstein and the beautiful blonde with Queen Marie Antoinette and her son with Louis XVII. Many in recent years believe that the heart tested as that of Louis was not his heart but of his brother Dauphin Louis -Joseph who died as a boy in 1789 (whose heart wasn't embalmed due to the outbreak of the Revolution). Catholic mystics have always stated that Louis did escape and that the future Great Monarch of Catholic prophecy would be his descendant. Did Baron Gerning give Louis into the care of the House of Hesse who placed him in the care of Prince Frederick III of Hesse Kassel-Rumpenheim (Rumpelstiltskin) who was a Danish General whose mother was an English Princess?  Or did Prince Frederick himself participate in the rescue with Baron Gerning? Did he replace their oldest son William (who may have died at this time) with Louis and did he become Prince William of Hesse-Kassel-Rumpenheim? 

Queen Louise of Denmark possible granddaughter of Queen Marie Antoinette of France

This Prince was the father of the future Queen Louise of Denmark the wife of King Christian IX and an ancestor of Prince Phillip the Duke of Edinburgh. His wife was the Oldenburg Princess Louise Charlotte of Denmark. Was his only son Prince Frederick William (b.1820 d.1884) the true heir to the Bourbon throne of France? In 1851 Prince Frederick William abdicated his rights to the Danish throne to his sister Louise who was to become the Queen of Christian IX. Was this renunciation partially due to the knowledge that he was not truly an Oldenburg or Hesse but a Bourbon in the male line?

Prince Frederick William of Hesse-Kassel-Rumpenheim the Elector of Hesse

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Story Telling or Story Testing: Evolutionary Genetics

Today I was listening to a talk by a leading evolutionary biologist who was criticising those who were misusing genetics by creating stories of history and movements of peoples based on a faulty understanding of the genetic evidence that have no basis in recorded accounts and archeology etc. He commented that Story Telling needs to be Story Tested by science. While agreeing with him on many points- I couldn't help being amused that he did not follow his own advice as he interprets genetics within the greatest fanciful story of our time, Darwinian Evolution.

Applying the evolutionary paradigm on genetics has totally distorted the evidence and led to many of these ridiculous theories. The imagined and unscientific evolutionary understanding of mutation rates is at odds with the mutation rates based on the germ line actually observed in families. The whole evolutionary myth of ice age refuges found in genetic literature until recently led to many of these stories. For example, some scientists told us that the Gaelic population came from Spain 10,000 or more years ago even though historians and archeologists of the recent past spoke of the Milesian Irish (Gaels) coming to Ireland about 300-200 BC. We were confidently told by a leading authority in a major documentary that we were all descended from the pygmy people of South Africa until that was discarded with further research.

Unfortunately much of the field of academia today interprets the evidence within this false paradigm of evolution which is a philosophy rather than a science. Those of us that believe that human, animal and plant life are no more than 10,000 years old are marginalised in the totalitarian world of peer-reviewed academia  even though there are scientists in all fields who reject the evolutionary hypothesis. For example, I have a good friend who is a geophysicist who does not accept the evolutionary theory anymore.

However genetics can be very useful when one discards the exaggerated dates imposed by the evolutionary paradigm. One can then test their theories based on archeology, historical accounts, legends, myths, genealogies, geology, the Scriptures etc with the genetic dna data and adjust their stories accordingly. 

For many years based on my research I claimed that King Niall of the Nine Hostages was a descendant of St Joseph of Arimathea before the advent of ydna testing. When it was proposed that Niall was the origin of M222+ ydna I believed that the Davidic ydna of the House of Nathan to which Joseph of Arimathea belonged was R1b L21+ (which is ancestral to M222+). Most recent studies have demonstrated that the origin of M222+ is more likely around 2000 years ago in Southern England (around Devon). I then adjusted my understanding as it would seem that this even more strongly demonstrates my genealogical research and I realised that St Joseph of Arimathea or his son or grandson were the originators of the mutation M222+. British tradition tells us that St Joseph of Arimathea and his descendants were at Glastonbury in southern England and in the areas of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset.

Based on the writings of Velikovsky I believed that Akhnaten and his family were descended from King David and Solomon of Israel and that they had R1b1a2 ydna. Then came the news that Akhnaten and his family indeed had R1b1a2 ydna. Many people still question this but those who had through prior research demonstrated the Davidic connections with the dynasty of Akhnaten, based on a realignment of the Egyptian dynasties first proposed by Velikovsky, were not surprised by these results.

To evaluate events based on the evolutionary criteria is not story testing but more circular storytelling. Evolutionists will often criticise fundamentalist creationists for using the Bible in a literal manner as their paradigm for interpreting the data while doing the same thing themselves with the Darwinian paradigm. As a Catholic I do not have to accept either the literalistic creationist paradigm or the Darwinian evolutionary paradigm, though I may do so if this is what most convinces me fits the data. I certainly do not think Genesis 1 is meant to be read as a science text but I am also open to the idea that while its primary purpose isn't of a scientific nature it may give us insights into cosmology and science. 

While I incline to the view that the earth and our solar system is less than 10,000 years old, I am open to the opinion that the 'Heavens' are a lot older than that. But I might be wrong and so might we all. Just as many scientists look at the science of 100 years ago to have been very primitive so the scientists in a further 100 years may look back to our time as very naive and primitive. The evolutionary biologist, I first mentioned, spoke about the importance of further testing of ancient dna in our understandings of the movements of people. I would heartily agree with him. The testing of ancient dna in Europe has demonstrated so far that R1b did not enter Europe until at least the European Bronze Age, thus correcting many previous theories about R1b. Further studies also revealed that R1b was not a Western European phenomenon but that R1b is to be found throughout the Middle East and as far as Western China and Nepal as well as South Asia and Africa. 

However we must also be careful of accepting the terms Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age. They may be different periods of time in different parts of the world. They are not necessarily in chronological sequence as all three may exist at the same time as they are a technological level rather than a time piece. For example, Iron Age Europeans lived along side Stone Age Aboriginals in Australia. Also a settlement may be classified as Stone Age because that is all that has survived as the bronze and iron objects may have corroded away into nothing. The so-called Bronze Age peoples may have had Iron but due to the large period of time or differing climatic conditions or flooding all the iron objects have rusted away.

Anyone who has read my blog would know that I obviously love story telling and would encourage others to be creative in their story telling. However we should not be dogmatic about our story tellings so that we remain open to new information. Our stories should be rooted in solid research in a holistic manner while recognising the importance of other stories which could also fit the data of our research. 

The evolutionary biologist, mentioned previously, warns against assuming that because a certain dna type is found in one area today, that this area is its origin. Many assumed and still some believe that R1b originates in Western Europe because it has its highest density in that area today. However R1b is also found in the Middle East and other places. In order to find out its origin we need to study the deeper clades of R1b and the history, legends, myths and archeology of that culture. In fact due to mass migrations the original homeland of a haplogroup may today have little or no dna of that type. This is where the testing of ancient dna is crucial.

see Y-dna Clans

see Recent C-14 Dating of Fossils including Dinosaur Bone Collagen.

DNA Evidence Debunks the “Out-of-Africa” Theory of Human Evolution

Violent Volcanic Blasts Ripped Through Antarctic Ice Sheet Twice

Under-Ice Volcano Eruption Spewed Ash Over Antarctica


Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Julio Cesare di Rossi aka St Lawrence of Brindisi

Julio Cesare di Rossi was born in Naples in 1559 the son of the merchant Guglielmo di Rossi and his wife Elisabetta Masella. His parents were devout Catholics of Jewish ancestry. Guglielmo's father Giacomo di Rossi a Jewish merchant from Ferrara who with his wife became Catholics under the patronage of Ercole II the Duke of Este. Giacomo (aka Jacob) was the son of Moses di Rossi of Mantua. The di Rossi family of both the Jewish and Christian branches were connected to the families of the Dukes of Este and the Lords of Pico de Mirandola. These families shared an interest in Kabbalah and how the Jewish and Catholic mystical traditions reveal deep insight into the Divine Revelation found in Scripture.

The Jewish origins of Julio Cesare di Rossi who became San Lorenzo [St. Lawrence] of Brindisi has been obscured even though his writings reflect the rich traditions of his Jewish origins. He may have drawn on the Jewish and Catholic mystical teachings as they were developed in the writings of Giovanni Pico de Mirandola and Giovanni Francesco Pico de Mirandola. Even the Jewish branches of the family such as the famous Salamone di Rossi the musician and his singer sister Europa di Rossi were connected to these aristocratic families who were patrons of the arts and learning with a special interest in the Jewish and Catholic mystical traditions.

Europa was a name found in both the Jewish and Catholic branches of the di Rossi (Rossa, Rossi, Russo) family. In Hebrew they were called min ha Adumim (from the Red) or Edumim. They were an ancient Jewish Roman family that legend states were bought to Rome by Titus. Rabbi Azariah (Bonaiuto) di Rossi was also a famous Jewish member of the family. Berechiah Russo the Sabbatean may also have come from the Jewish branch of this family.

San Lorenzo di Rossi of Brindisi was believed by the Jewish community to be a Jew who had become a Catholic. No doubt the Jewish rabbis knew of his family's Jewish origins and his features also were very Jewish. His knowledge of the Jewish writings and the Scriptures in Hebrew, Greek , Aramaic and Arabic were extraordinary which further reinforced the Jewish belief is his Jewish origins. He is said to have converted thousands of Jews to Catholicism. He was later declared a Doctor of the Church. Some believe that his Marian insights were on a par with those of St Maximillian Kolbe. He was also instrumental in his day in rallying the Christian forces to stop the Islamic Turkish advance and went into battle leading the men with only a crucifix as his weapon.

Monday, June 1, 2015

Nostradamus' pictures

The Wikipedia article on this topic states - "The Vaticinia Michaelis Nostradami de Futuri Christi Vicarii ad Cesarem Filium D. I. A. Interprete (The Prophecies of Michel Nostradamus on the Future Vicars of Christ to Cesar his son, as expounded by Lord Abbot Joachim), or Vaticinia Nostradami (The Prophecies of Nostradamus) for short, is a collection of eighty watercolor images compiled as an illustrated codex.[1] A version of the well-known Vaticinia de Summis Pontificibus of the 13th-14th century,[2] it was discovered in 1982 by the Italian journalists Enza Massa and Roberto Pinotti in the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Roma (Central National Library) in Rome, Italy.[3] The document can be found in the library under the title, "Fondo Vittorio Emanuele 307"."

This drawing (image 80) is from the lost manuscript of Nostradamus found in the Central Roman library in 1982 (others claim it was discovered in 1994). It shows the Pope after the Pope who flees into exile. This Pope is a Jewish Pope who is seen here sitting on the chair of Peter speaking with the young new generation of Jewish Rabbinic authorities who have entered the Church at the time near the beginning of the Era of Peace. Their dress is similar to the dress of Medieval Jewish leaders and philosophers.

A gathering of 13th century Rabbis in France

Image 81 shows some of these young Jewish apostles dressed in work clothes preparing for the New Springtime prophesied by Pope John Paul II.

Image 82 shows Mary proclaimed in dogma as Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix and Advocate which leads to the fullness of her Immaculate Heart's triumph.

This drawing (image 79) from the lost Nostradamus collection shows the Pope who is fleeing Rome at a time when the clergy are being persecuted and killed and Islamist warriors at the gates of Rome or alternatively some believe it shows the time of the false or Black Pope who seizes Rome after the true or white Pope flees Rome.

Image 77 shows a Pope with his Cross on fire and many turning their back on him and his teaching except for some poor humble women.

Image 78 shows the Pope or a cleric (Padre Pio?) and Luisa Piccarreta holding the "Book of Heaven" with a small nun (Mother Teresa of Calcutta) holding the Pope's staff.

Image 76 shows Pope John Paul II and his ministry to all peoples. An angry religious has taken the Pope's cross and walking cane symbolising those religious who have sought power and control in the church to the detriment of the Pope the Church and the world.

Note: The interpretation of the drawings given here are my own based on the Catholic prophecies through the ages.

Also see here for more on the lost manuscript of Nostradamus