Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Sons of Levi and Aaron


In other articles I have written about R1b-ht-35 being the haplotype of the authentic sons of Levi and Aaron. I have also written of the region of northern England and southern Scotland as a region of Jewish Christian settlement in Roman times. It would seem that those places that have R1b-ht-35 also have Eb3 and J2. R1b-ht35, Eb3 and J2 are also found among those claiming Levite and Cohen status among Jews today. This represents an influx of Second Temple Jewish diaspora. While those places in which R1b-ht35 is found without Eb3 and J2 are descended from the earlier First Temple Levites and Cohanim before the Samaritan admixture entered among the Israelite families of the sons of Levi in the time of the Maccabees.

"...Research conducted by the administrators of the Border Reivers DNA Project has identified numerous haplotypes in persons of British descent that show Haplotype 35 markers. Moreover, most of these haplotypes appear to originate from areas of Britain near the Antonine Wall, Hadrian's Wall and other places of Roman fortification or settlement. These areas include Galloway, Dumfries, Ayrshire and The Borders in Scotland, and Cumbria, Yorkshire, Lancashire, Shropshire and Staffordshire in England. Many of the Roman troops stationed in these areas came from Southeastern Europe or Western Asia. They included Sarmatians, Dacians, Goths, Syrians, Mesopotamians, Thracians and Anatolians. The Capelli study has shown that these areas also exhibit higher than average frequencies of haplogroups E3b and J2, neither of which is native to Britain. E3b is found most commonly in North Africa, Iberia, the Mediterranean and the Near East,and J2 occurs most frequently in the Near East, the Mediterranean and Western Asia. The fact that all three groups - E3b, J2 and Haplotype 35 - have a similar origin in territories of the Roman Empire, and occur at comparable frequencies in parts of Britain with a known history of Roman settlement, suggests that they arrived in Britain through the same means..."


Note: E3b is also known as E1b1b (E-M215)

see King Arthur of Britain

see The Book of the Scottish Kabbalah

see Cohanim ht-35

see Sons of Jacob

Monday, November 28, 2011

Was Hitler a Rothschild?


One often comes across statements that Adolf Hitler was the paternal grandson of an Ashkenazi Jew. The two main claimants to this are Leopold Frankenberger and one of the Rothschild's family- claims are made for Baron Solomon Mayer Rothschild, Lionel Nathan Rothschild and Nathan Mayer Rothschild. Recent genetic testing on male relatives of Hitler demonstrate that he indeed belongs to E1b1b (E3b) which is common among Ashkenazi Jews. I believe this Levite Samaritan strand entered Judaism in Second Temple Times. It would seem that Frankenberger is the most likely candidate of Hitler's grandfather as proposed by Hans Frank.

The Rothschild's family descended from Amschel Mayer Rothschild belong to J2 ydna which some claim is the Cohen ydna. The legend is that the Rothschild's family descend from Rabbi Mayer (Meir) a grandson of the Emperor Nero. However I believe it is the ydna of the Samaritan convert to Judaism called Zadok who founded the Sadduccean sect of Judaism. J2 Jewish claimants to Cohen status descend from this Samaritan-Jewish Zadok who claimed priestly status. J1 Cohens descend from the Samaritan High priest Ishmael of First Temple Times whose descendants (the Shammaites/Shamerim) also converted to Judaism in the time of the Maccabees. The actual Cohen and Levite lineage coming from Aaron and Levi is R1b-ht35.

Thus I think it is conclusive that Hitler was not a member of the Rothschild's family but Leopold Frankenberger may have been his grandfather.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

More on Tutankhamun ydna


For those who have been following the discussion about the ydna of the Egyptian Pharoah's related to Tutankhamun the following link on CTV News dated 2 August 2011 may be of interest.

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110802/king-tut-dna-european-110802/

The article discusses how iGenea is offering a ydna test for those interested in finding out if they are closely related to King Tut. Of course they are following the latest evolutionary datings for R1b1a2 that date its genesis back to the Caucasus region around 9,500 years ago and its entry into Europe 7,000 years ago. This is better than the previous datings of R1b and R1b1a2 but still much too old.

Using the actual ydna rates found in R1b families and also taking into account Immanuel Velikovsky's redating of King Tutankhamen's Dynasty to the ninth century BC fits the evidence of a later date much better. This is confirmed by the Radio Carbon datings of artifacts in Tutankhamen's tomb. As Velikovsky wrote: "...In 1971, or seven years later, the British Museum processed palm kernels and mat reed from the tomb of Tutankhamen. The resulting dates, as Dr. Edwards, Curator of the Egyptian Department of the British Museum, wrote to the University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon laboratory, were -899 for the palm kernels and -846 for the mat reed..."

Thus I would date R1b1a2 to between 3,000-4,000 years ago in Ancient Israel. I would also date its parent R1b to about 4000 years ago. A large grouping of R1b1a2 moved in to the Caucasus Mountain region of Assyria about 2,500 years ago and from here moved in different waves into Europe across the Russian (Scythian) steppes. Tutankhamun received his R1b1a2 dna from King Solomon (who married an Egyptian Princess)who lived about 150 years before Tutankhamun according to Velikovsky. Thus his ydna would most likely be R1b1a2-L21 which I believe is the ydna signature of the Royal Davidic House. This does not mean that Tutankhamun looked like a red-haired Scotsman or like his red-haired ancestor King David. However in the mummies of this dynasty there is evidence of red and blonde hair in the Royal family and their ancestors. One's racial features come from the mix of all one's ancestors not just the ancestry of one's father's direct male line.

Note: Further revision of the datings of the ancient world also need to be taken into account. The date usually given for the destruction of the First Temple of Solomon today in 586 BC whereas Jewish sources say 422-5 BC- in fact I believe it is around 460-5 BC. Solomon lived in the 9th century BC not the tenth. The First Temple was built around the 860 BC. I believe the datings of the Exodus in the 13th dynasty, Solomon in the 18th dynasty and the time of the Babylonian Exile in the 19th dynasty by Velikovsky to be correct. However I believe Velikovsky's dates have to be revised down as he accepted the 586 BC dating of the Destruction of the the First Temple. I believe that originally Jewish authorities dated the Temple to around 460 BC but later adjusted it by 40 years so that the 490 years ended at the destruction of the Second Temple rather than the crucifixion of Jesus. Thus Rameses II lived in the 5th century BC.

see this Tutankhamun and R1b1b2 DNA